France’s at times toxic debate over immigration anticipated America’s contemporary global debate over immigration, one that scapegoats the most vulnerable populations as thieves, rapists and murderers. England’s decision to leave
the European Union, what’s become popularly known as “Brexit,” came in the wake of a xenophobic campaign that smeared immigration as spelling the death knell of a racially pure British identity.
The United States of America’s pride in its longstanding immigrant roots and history as the world’s greatest melting pot took a drastic detour during the 2016 presidential election. Donald Trump’s increasingly vitriolic denunciation
of immigrants became the hallmark of his stunning presidential election — a victory that represented a decisive setback for those who argued that racial, ethnic and religious diversity strengthened, rather than harmed or disrupted, democracies.
The racial and ethnic diversity of the French World Cup team offers another, more optimistic, lesson about immigration, globalization and citizenship. While the entire team will be hailed as heroes in France, those of African descent still face discrimination based on the color of their skin. Countless numbers of African immigrants, including those fleeing war zones, face daunting prospects of gaining entrée into France for themselves and their families.
The French people’s warm embrace of African sports icons should be extended to the large numbers of immigrants from across the African and Caribbean diaspora who are seeking a refuge against man-made and natural disasters in their country of origin.
And we can look
to the French support of Mbappe and his fellow teammates for guidance. From Mbappe’s Parisian suburb of Bondy and beyond, French citizens — young and old — have proudly hung French football banners, worn Mbappe jerseys and shouted words of encouragement for the team’s players.
In short, the World Cup champions remind us all that, in an era of globalization, racial and ethnic diversity represent an enduring strength at all levels of society, ones that build cultural and political bridges within and between countries, nation-states and neighborhoods.
For millions of soccer fans around the world, Africa, in effect, just won the World Cup! This is more than just wishful thinking. The make-up of the French team represents a powerful response against building walls and detention centers to detain and dehumanize immigrant populations.
The global debate over immigration is the human rights issue of our time. How are we to treat the women, men, children and families who risk their lives for opportunities that thrive in western society? The West’s long history of conquest makes this a particularly sensitive issue since many immigrants from Africa and other parts of the developing world are seeking to return to a nation that innovated their ancestral exploitation during slavery and its brutal aftermath.
We can no longer afford to pretend that immigrants entering any nation on earth are not fellow citizens seeking the opportunity to thrive and become citizens of a reimagined world community. France’s World Cup team demonstrates to all how immigration, at its best, holds the key to a liberated and more humane future for us all.
3 thoughts on “France’s World Cup win is a victory for immigrants everywhere”
Is this a French or an African team?
Congratulations to France and their highly-skilled players who have demonstrated their ability on the world stage. Yet, I am not sure if I follow the logic here because it seems to me that if a sports win by Black athletes were to result in higher acceptance rates of Blacks and other people of color in the United States our NBA and NFL players should have made a movement like Black Lives Matter unnecessary. Yet that has not been the case. In the U.S. we have seen innocent Blacks shot and strangled in public by police officers even though Black athletes excel in sports. And the most prominent athlete, Kaepernick, who has taken a knee during NFL games to protest police violence and mass incarceration, has been unsigned and left without a contract in the coming season. The notion that immigrants are seeking “refuge against man-made and natural disasters” is a bit of a stretch unless the man-made disasters include appropriation of African resources (including people) through imperialism and colonialism that has stunted local economies and caused migration to the north. Likewise, the “natural disaster” might be the global warming caused by unbridled capitalism as practiced in European and other countries. Despite U.S. Black athletes social and economic gains, the median wealth of U.S. Blacks is about $10,000 while that of Whites is $120,000. So, the equality in our case is equal access to inequality.