Francio Guadeloupe (University of Amsterdam/KITLV Leiden) invites us to consider: “Perhaps undoing racism is inconceivable without bidding adieu to ‘sedentary metaphysics.’” Join Livio Sansone (Federal University of Bahia, Brazil), Jasmijn Rana (University of Leiden), Anouk de Koning (University of Leiden), Niv Cohen (Independent Artist), and Peter Pels (University of Leiden), in “The Otherwise Atlantic/Thinking the African Diaspora Theories as Universals”—an art exhibition and roundtable.
This event takes place on Tuesday, November 2, 2021, 11:00 am-1:00 pm, at the University of Leiden (Pieter de la Court Building, Room 1.A20).
Description: In the past decades, the universalist conceit of North Atlantic social and cultural sciences has been increasingly “provincialized”, not least because we increasingly ask the question whether and how African diaspora thinking builds an alternative transatlantic universalism, grounded in black experiences in North, Caribbean, and Latin America, and in South-South exchanges with Africa.
This Roundtable explores how theory and critical praxis formulated from such positions may acquire general theoretical and empirical relevance – not just in the situations from which they first emerged, but even more so to understand other places where discrimination and oppression are structurally built into social life. Is – to take an example from W.E.B. Du Bois – “double consciousness” a general theory about how subjectivities develop in situations of structural discrimination (rather than a ‘mere’ description of the “souls of black folk”)? If so, what does this tell us about how “provincial” North Atlantic universal theories of consciousness in social practice are? Were African diaspora intellectuals indeed pioneers of globalization theory, long before this was discovered in the North Atlantic in the 1980s, and what does this tell us about the parochial origins of the “sedentary metaphysics” of North Atlantic nation-states that have characterized social science until recently? How do such alternative universalisms affect our understanding of changing social relationships in Europe or Africa?
Our discussion will start from considering what the (history of the) anthropology and sociology of race and racism in the Americas, and the perspectives developed therefrom, has taught us about the opportunities and defects of social scientific understanding. We will then move on to a discussion of how such insights provide a new understanding of the situations that social scientists find themselves in today, and the futures of thinking, but also of representing people more broadly, that seem to appear on our horizons.