According to the Jamaica Gleaner, yesterday (April 23, 2018) the British government said Commonwealth nationals, including those from the Caribbean, who came to Britain between 1948 and 1973 would have their status formalized following the controversy that erupted over the so-called undocumented United Kingdom (UK) immigrants.
In a statement to Parliament today, Home Secretary Amber Rudd apologised for the change in immigration rules even as opposition legislators called for her resignation. “This should never have happened. We need to show a human face to how we work and exercise greater judgement where it is justified,” Rudd told Parliament, adding that all Home Office records dating back to 2002 would be checked to see if anyone had been wrongly deported. “The state has let these people down, travel documents denied, exclusions of returning to the UK, benefits cut and threats to deport. This has happened for some time. I will put this right and where people have suffered loss, they will be compensated,” she told lawmakers.
Rudd has promised to speed up the compensation for anyone who had “suffered loss” and that the citizenship offer would apply not just to the families of Caribbean migrants who came to the UK between 1948 and 1973 but anyone from other Commonwealth nations who settled in the UK over the same period.
She told lawmakers that the new policy had an “unintended and devastating” impact on the so-called Windrush generation and that while the public expected immigration rules to be enforced, it had never been the intention for a crackdown on illegal immigration to affect those who were “British in all but their legal status” [. . .] “None of this can undo the pain already endured, but I hope it demonstrates the government’s commitment to put these wrongs right going forward.”
Shadow Home Secretary Diane Abbott said the situation “should not have been a surprise” given the warnings the government had received. She said “ultimately buck stops” with Rudd but that “she is behaving as if it is a shock to her that officials are implementing regulations in the way she intended them to be implemented”. The Opposition legislator said whiles she welcomed the promise of compensation, there was a lack of detail and the sums should “reflect the damage to family life” suffered by families and not be “token”.
Labour’s David Lammy, a leading campaigner for justice for Windrush families, said they were being offered something which was already their right. He called for the government to help others who also made their life in the UK after World War Two but who might not get equal treatment. [. . .]
Also see previous article (and photo above) at https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/editorials/windrush-generation-theresa-may-amber-rudd-voting-rights-id-jeremy-corbyn-a8316926.html