Brian Palmer (journalist, documentary filmmaker, and professor at Hampton University) writes that the reparations movement in the Caribbean has lessons for blacks in the United States:
Last month, representatives from member states of CARICOM (the Caribbean Community and Common Market) and half a dozen other nations gathered in tiny St. Vincent and the Grenadines to discuss an idea regarded by some in the United States as radical, fringe, even nuts: reparations for “native genocide and slavery.” Such a high-level, official conclave could happen in the Caribbean for one obvious reason: People of African descent are in the majority.
Of the 12.5 million captive Africans shipped to the New World during the 16th, 17th, 18th and 19th centuries, most wound up laboring in the Caribbean and South America, not the United States, as The Root’s own Henry Louis Gates Jr. reminded us last year. Although nearly 500,000 Africans were off-loaded in the British colonies of North America (later the U.S.), more than a million enslaved people were shipped to the island of Jamaica alone, and more than 600,000 to Barbados.
“The legacy of slavery and colonialism in the Caribbean has severely impaired our development options,” said Dorbrene E. O’Marde in his address to the First Regional Reparations Conference, held in St. Vincent and the Grenadines’ capital city of Kingstown. O’Marde is chairman of the Antigua and Barbuda Reparations Support Commission. “These nations that have been the major producers of wealth for the European slave-owning economies entered independence with dependency straddling their economic, cultural, social and even political lives.”
CARICOM’s September conference wasn’t a one-off. It’s part of a formal, multinational program both to raise the issue of reparations in international forums and to seek redress from European nations — England, the Netherlands and France — for the Atlantic slave trade and its enduring effects.
St. Vincent and the Grenadines Prime Minister Ralph Gonsalves invited United Kingdom law firm Leigh Day to advise his government and then to present at the conference. The firm has a history of taking on cases rooted in history. In June, Leigh Day won a $30.8 million settlement on behalf of elderly Kenyans tortured by officers of the British colonial government in the 1950s and ’60s — along with an expression of regret from Foreign Minister William Hague. “Our advice to the Caribbean states is to bring a claim related to the impact of slavery on the Caribbean today,” Leigh Day partner Martyn Day told The Root via email. “That fits within the framework of the International Convention [on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination] and is likely to resonate far better than a historic claim relating to the treatment of the slaves.”
Day says that cases would be brought against individual governments. If no settlement can be reached through that method, then the matter would move to the U.N.’s International Court of Justice. “There is a strong feeling of injustice that still rankles in the Caribbean. It is an issue that will not go away until it is addressed,” Day wrote. “Being addressed means a combination of a proper formal apology and compensation.”
All of this activity by CARICOM doesn’t mean that there’s universal support across the Caribbean for reparations. There are plenty of voices against the idea. Before, during and after the conference, they were heating up the letters and comments sections of major news outlets like Jamaica’s Gleaner. Some regard the call for reparations as a straight-up shakedown of Europeans and a canny way to divert attention from Caribbean politicians’ own poor leadership. But the pro-reparations folks, led by actual heads of state, clearly run the show. (Jamaica’s prime minister, Portia Simpson Miller, called for “an international discussion in a nonconfrontational manner on the question of reparations” at the United Nations General Assembly.)
Things are a bit different here in the U.S. Over the years, there have been sporadic, reasoned and publicized debates among scholars, and even in Congress. Prominent African-American opponents such as Roger Clegg and Armstrong Williams from the right, and Paul Gilroy (an Afro-Brit who taught at Yale for a time) from the left, have weighed in. But the debate always stops at a certain level of officialdom before it can become part of the national agenda. [. . .]
For full article, see http://www.theroot.com/views/legacy-slavery-still-monumental?page=0,1