In Haiti, Standoff over Presidential Runoff Seen as Threat

This Los Angeles Times article was written before Jean-Claude Duvalier’s arrival. It speaks about how Haiti is locked in a political crisis that threatens to further stall recovery from last year’s earthquake and how it could swiftly turn violent. It is frightening to think of how tensions and hostilities have drastically increased by adding fuel to the fire with Duvalier back in Haiti, and now facing corruption charges. See excerpts here with a link to the full article below:

Seven weeks after a flawed presidential election, President Rene Preval is resisting an international panel’s recommendation that his handpicked candidate be removed from a runoff, according to diplomatic sources. Preval also is saying he intends to remain in office beyond his term.

Haiti desperately needs to seat a new government to move ahead in the reconstruction of its quake-ravaged capital, where hundreds of thousands of people languish in vast tent cities, and to ease the disbursement of aid money, analysts say. The core of the dispute now is over which candidates qualify for the runoff to the Nov. 28 vote — and whether fraud was so extensive that the entire process should be discarded and done over.

By most accounts, Mirlande Manigat, a professor who briefly served as first lady two decades ago, won the highest number of votes in November’s hastily arranged election. The government-controlled Provisional Electoral Council, to the surprise of many election observers, then placed Preval’s candidate, minor technocrat Jude Celestin, in the No. 2 finishing spot, which would have sent him into a runoff with Manigat originally scheduled for Sunday but postponed indefinitely because of the uncertainty. The council’s count put popular musician Michel “Sweet Micky” Martelly in third place and out of contention.

Protests over those purported results erupted throughout Port-au-Prince as soon as they were announced in early December. Thousands of Haitians rioted, burned down buildings and paralyzed this capital, accusing Preval’s government of stealing the election.

Under pressure, Preval agreed to an inspection of the vote by the Organization of American States. In a report that has not officially been made public but has been widely leaked, the OAS found that the outcome was not credible and had involved the rampant stuffing of ballot boxes (more than 200 polling stations supposedly registered 100 percent turnout when overall turnout barely reached 20 percent). The OAS determined that “it cannot support the preliminary results.”

The report recommended that Celestine be eliminated and the runoff spot given to Martelly, who bested Celestine by 0.3 percent of the vote, according to the OAS.

Preval initially refused to accept delivery of the OAS report; adopting its recommendations would mean acknowledging that his supporters engaged in well-orchestrated electoral fraud. The report finally was delivered to the government Thursday. Preval, an aloof and mercurial leader in the best of times, has been much criticized for his uninspired handling of Haiti’s wretched year of crisis. He now must decide whether to accept the OAS recommendations, as the international community is urging, or ignore them and risk further isolation. [. . .]

Preval, who cannot stand for a second consecutive term, has said publicly that he will remain in office beyond the Feb. 7 end of his mandate. He argues that his own inauguration was delayed (by disputed results then too), entitling him to rule until April.

For full article, see

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s